- Mortgages
- Remortgages
- Bad Credit Mortgages
- Buy to Let Mortgages
- Life Insurance
- Home Ins
- Utility Switch
- Credit Check
- Conveyancing
- About Us
- Terms and Conditions
- Privacy Policy
- Contact Us
- Accessibility
- Site Map
- Mortgage Site Map
- Life Insurance Site Map
- News 2013
- News Achieve 2012
- News Achieve 2011
- News Achieve 2010
- News Achieve 2009
- News Achieve 2008
- News Achieve 2007
- Insurance News Achieve
- Articles Archive
- Recruitment
- ©Copyright 2023
Survey reveals it’s not easy being green
Interest in all things ethical has undoubtedly come a long way in a relatively short space of time and the same is true of ethical investment. However, the latest survey from Investment Life & Pensions Moneyfacts has revealed that ethical funds have struggled in the more difficult stock market conditions encountered over the last 12 months.
The survey examined the performance of ethical funds, conventional non-ethical funds, index trackers and the FTSE 100 over a number of investment periods (see table below). Our previous review of the ethical sector conducted in September last year noted that in a testing environment for most investments, ethical funds had suffered particularly badly. Unfortunately, the past year has offered little respite.
As table 1 below shows the average ethical fund has dropped 16.74% in value in the 12 months to 1 July 2009, while non-ethical funds fell by a margin of 12.3%. A year earlier, ethical funds had fallen 14.2 per cent over the same period, compared to an 8.31% drop for non-ethical funds. Over the last year, only three out of 60 ethical funds delivered positive growth.
Meanwhile, over three years, a previously positive return of 17.22% has turned into a 16.42%loss, which is also worse than the shortfall of 9.20% posted by non-ethical funds.
More encouragingly, over the longer term of five years, growth of 8.93% can be reported. However, this is a long way short of the 52.37% recorded a year earlier and also the return of 20.82% delivered by non-ethical funds during that time.
The disappointment is compounded over ten years, where an average loss of 4.28% again lags behind the growth of 26.74% posted by their conventional counterparts. Last year’s positive return of 26.51% is a distant memory.
Ethical funds versus non-ethical unit trusts (percentage growth)
|
1 year |
3 years |
5 years |
10 years |
Ethical Funds |
-16.74% |
-16.42% |
8.93% |
-4.28% |
Non-Ethical Funds |
-12.37% |
-9.20% |
20.82% |
26.74% |
Index-trackers |
-19.33% |
-18.88% |
11.77% |
-6.72% |
FTSE 100 |
-24.47% |
-27.16% |
-4.81% |
-32.75% |
Source: Lipper Hindsight. % Growth as at 1 Julyr 2009, total return, UK net, no initial charges
Richard Eagling, Editor of Investment Life & Pensions Moneyfacts said “Just two years ago, the defence for ethical fund performance was strong, with returns outstripping those of their non-ethical rivals. Unfortunately, the performance of ethical funds is now lagging behind that of their non-ethical counterparts. Although there is little doubt the past couple of years have been challenging for the green investor, the long term outlook for the ethical sector remains positive.”Moneyfacts Group
Moneyfacts is the UK’s leading independent provider of personal financial information and our data is used and trusted throughout the financial industry.
Think carefully before securing other debts against your home, your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage.
Go Direct.co.uk is a trading style for website purposes of Go Direct UK Ltd.
Go Financial Services is a trading style of Go Direct UK Ltd which is an appointed representative of Personal Touch Financial Services Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England & Wales Company 5703224. FCA Number 456600
We normally do not charge a fee for mortgage advice, however this is dependent on your circumstances. Our typical fee would be £349